Transparency Report Framework

Plain-language summary

This page explains the kind of periodic transparency reports we plan to publish once Clap Ideas is live.
We already show live, aggregate AI-operations metrics on our AI Transparency dashboard.
No periodic governance report has been published yet. The first is planned after public launch.
Future reports will cover moderation actions, appeals and their outcomes, legal and government requests, copyright takedowns, privacy requests, and safety reports.
They will include a high-level note on how AI is used in moderation and ranking. Clap Ideas is AI-autonomous, human-governed.
We aim to publish on a regular schedule (for example, yearly or twice a year) once there is enough activity to report.
Reports use aggregate numbers and are designed to protect the privacy of individual people.

1. Why we publish transparency reports

Clap Ideas is a public-interest platform. We believe people should be able to see how the platform is governed: how often we take action on content, how often people appeal, and how often outside parties ask us to remove content or hand over data. A transparency report is how we share that picture in an honest, aggregate form.

This page is the framework for those reports. It explains what we plan to measure and share, so you know what to expect before the first report is published.

2. Current status

No periodic governance report has been published yet. Clap Ideas is still preparing for public launch. We plan to publish the first report after launch, once there is enough real activity for the numbers to be meaningful. Until then, this page describes our intended approach, which may be refined as the platform matures.

We do already publish live, aggregate AI-operations metrics— such as run counts, success rates, latency, and moderation activity — on our AI Transparency dashboard. That dashboard is about how our AI systems run; the periodic report described here is broader and covers moderation outcomes, appeals, and outside requests.

3. What future reports will cover

We plan for each report to include figures such as the following:

Moderation actions.The volume of actions taken on content — for example, labels applied, content removed, and content restricted or hidden.
Appeals and outcomes. How many people appealed a moderation decision, and how those appeals turned out (for example, upheld or reversed).
Legal and government requests. The number of requests we received from courts, governments, or law enforcement, and how many we actioned.
Copyright takedowns. The number of copyright or other notice-and-takedown requests received and actioned, including counter-notices where relevant.
Privacy and data-subject requests. The number of requests to access, correct, or delete personal data, and how they were handled.
Safety reports. The volume of user reports about harmful, unsafe, or illegal content and behaviour, at a high level.
The role of AI. A plain-language note on how AI supports moderation and ranking, and where humans stay in charge.

4. The role of AI: autonomous, human-governed

Clap Ideas is AI-autonomous, human-governed. AI does a lot of the routine work — it helps classify content, detect duplicates, draft research, and rank ideas. But people set the rules, review sensitive decisions, and have the final say on enforcement and governance.

Future reports will give a high-level view of how much of the moderation and ranking pipeline is AI-assisted, and how human review fits in. For the full picture of what AI does and its limits, see our AI Transparency Policy, and for how moderation and appeals work, see our Moderation, Enforcement & Appeals Policy.

5. How often we plan to publish

We aim to publish transparency reports on a regular schedule once the volume of activity makes a report meaningful — for example, annually or semi-annually. Early on, while numbers are small, we may publish less often or combine periods. We will state the period each report covers, so the figures are easy to compare over time.

6. Notice-and-action and EU users

Where we serve users in the European Union, we are aware of notice-and-action expectations under frameworks such as the EU Digital Services Act (DSA). As the platform grows and our obligations are confirmed with counsel, we plan to align our reporting with the relevant requirements, including clear ways to report illegal content and information about how such reports are handled. This page is a baseline that is subject to counsel review and may be expanded to meet specific legal duties.

7. How we count and protect privacy

Transparency reports are about patterns, not individuals. To protect privacy while staying informative:

We report aggregate counts and trends, not personal details.
We do not publish information that would identify an individual user, reporter, or the subject of a report.
Where a category has very small numbers, we may group or round figures so individuals cannot be singled out.
We define how we count each metric so the numbers are consistent and can be compared across reporting periods.

How we handle personal data more generally is explained in our Privacy Policy.

This framework works together with our Moderation, Enforcement & Appeals Policy, our AI Transparency Policy, and our Privacy Policy. Questions about transparency reporting can be sent to legal@clapideas.com.

Change history is tracked by document version; see the Legal Centre.